In 2020, internal combustion engine powered vehicles were responsible for aboutone-fifth of Europes carbon emissions.

While ambitious, this does seem like an achievable goal.

This is great, obviously, but all of these cars will have to be charged somewhere.

What comes first: The EV or the charger? The EU’s mobility conundrum

These are legitimate concerns, as public charging infrastructure access throughout Europe remains very much lopsided.

40% off TNW Conference!

The EU report notes that achieving this electric utopia is a chicken-and-egg problem.

Pie chart showing what type of car Europeans will buy next

Electric charging infrastructure build-out follows EV sales, and EV sales are slowed down by lack of charging infrastructure.

ChargeUP Europe proposes a number of policy suggestions to take a stab at overcome this conundrum.

Publicly accessible charging infrastructure is largely managed by private companies that build and maintain the chargers.

Charge Up Europe’s Recommendations for the revision of alternative fuels infrastructure development

Europes electricity generators say that capacity is not a problem.

Theyre expecting 130 million electric vehicles by 2035 in Europe, and that should be fine.

Charging frustrations

Consumer-friendliness is another issue that the industry faces due to lack of regulation.

Current supply overview of EVs and public chargers across the EU countries

By offering Polestar drivers a card that works at different charging operators, some of this pain is relieved.

But Svensson admits theres still a long way to go, largely because operators dont always share data.

Then you get the issue of availability and reliability of the charging points.

Image of the EV charging ecosystem

Once you reach one, are there hundreds of others waiting in line?

Is the charging point actually working?

One charger + one charger = two chargers

Another big issue is the charging speed.

Polestar and charger

It takes a while to charge electric vehicles, especially for longer trips.

But having a 50KW charger every 100 kilometers is a completely different story than having faster 175KW chargers.

And second, because it gives more granular control over where investments in charging infrastructure should go.

Carbon footprint for Polestar 2 variants and XC40 ICE, with different electricity mixes in the use phase used for the Polestar 2 variants. Results are shown in tonne CO₂ -equivalents per functional unit (200,000 km lifetime range).

But is it green?

But, its important to note that not all charging points are created equal.

While EVs cost more emissions to produce than ICE vehicles, their overall carbon footprint is significantly lower.

Total amount of GHG emissions, depending on kilometres driven, from Polestar 2 (with different electricity mixes in the use phase in the diagram), and XC40 ICE. All life cycle phases except use phase are summarised and set as the starting

But, when using green, wind-based energy, it only takes 50,000 km.

But policymakers are discussing potential options.

But this still requires a lot of work on open standards and interoperability.

Fastned_large fast charging station_300 kW (2)

Mainly, will EVs currently on the market be compatible with these systems?

Polestar put their Polestar 2 through an independent test lab to ensure it wascompatible with smart charging.

Some actively offer green energy by buying up renewable energy credits.

Others, like FastNed, have solar panels installed on charging stations to generate their own clean electricity.

Were still in the relatively early stages of the market, Fishbone concludes.

EVs are not yet a mass market phenomenon.

The market is clearly going in that direction, and the switch is going to happen.

But were not there yet.

Also tagged with